Bill C-38

Historical
Second reading (House)

An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)

Bill C-38 is at second reading in the House. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.

Sponsor:Patty Hajdu
Liberal
Session: 44-1
Introduced: 2022-12-14

Other Bills Numbered C-38

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 11 sessions:

44-1

An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)

Second reading (House)
42-1

An Act to amend An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exploitation and trafficking in persons)

Second reading (House)
41-2

An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2015

Law (royal assent given)
Law
41-1

An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures

Law (royal assent given)
Law
40-3

An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

Second reading (House)
40-2

An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act to enlarge Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-2

An Act to permit the resumption and continuation of the operation of the National Research Universal Reactor at Chalk River

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-1

An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2007

Law (royal assent given)
Law
38-1

An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes

Law (royal assent given)
Law
37-2

An Act to amend the Contraventions Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

Not active
37-1

An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law

Division Votes (0)

No recorded division votes found for this bill.

Parliamentary Debates (82)

Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-38.

Billy Morin2026-02-27
Indian Act
0

Government Orders

Mr. Speaker, ultimately, the original version of the bill is Bill C-38 through the Nicholas decision, and it affects primarily the Michel band in particular, of over 3,000 people approximately. I think the Liberals are phrasing this as one or the other. We can have both…

Read full speech →
Lori Idlout2026-02-27
Indian Act
0

Government Orders

…e sure that those Senate amendments are included in Bill S-2, particularly because, for example, in Bill C-38, there was a provision where first nations who had experienced discrimination would have been disallowed from seeking restitution. The Senate amendments to Bill S-2 propose to fix those kinds of inju…

Read full speech →
Lori Idlout2026-02-27
Indian Act
0

Government Orders

…he minister for sharing her time with me on this important bill, Bill S-2, to amend the Indian Act. Bill C-38, from the last Parliament, was a bill that I could not support at the time because of the inequities that first nations would continue to have. However, the NDP supports the Senate amendments to Bill…

Read full speech →
Elizabeth May2026-02-25
Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1
0

Government Orders

… Canadians have heard, a bill of over 600 pages. I remember the omnibus budget bill of spring 2012, Bill C-38. I was appalled when Stephen Harper tried to push it through and did in fact push it through. It took longer to debate, in fairness, but it was over 400 pages. The omnibus budget implementation act o…

Read full speech →
Dalwinder Gill2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…t agree more. This is why, over a year ago, the Conservative member for Edmonton Gateway introduced Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act, which set out a clear plan to address this crisis. The Liberals voted it down, choosing to side with criminals instead of communities. Conservatives have also …

Read full speech →
Hon. Pierre Poilievre2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…a. Conservatives have tried. We put forward amendments to the Criminal Code. For example, there was Bill C-381. I think that was the member for Edmonton Gateway's bill. It would create mandatory prison sentences of 10 years for extortionists. Liberals blocked it. Liberals obstructed. We tried to repeal Bill …

Read full speech →
Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

… asylum, (iii) Liberals voted against tougher sentencing for extortionists proposed by Conservative Bill C-381, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (extortion), (iv) Liberals have failed to repeal bills C-5, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, and C-75, An Act to amen…

Read full speech →
Brad Vis2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…he absence of real consequences. More than a year ago, I sponsored legislation in the House through Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act. This legislation would have delivered real jail time for serious offences, stronger penalties for organized crime involvement and a clear denunciation of extor…

Read full speech →
Hon. Tim Uppal2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…Conservatives have put forward real solutions. On extortion, I introduced my private member's bill, Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act, that would have restored mandatory jail time. The Liberal government voted against it. On asylum abuse, we warned the government years ago that criminals were …

Read full speech →
Fred Davies2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…ding those tied to serious criminal activity, to exploit Canada's asylum system. They voted against Bill C-381, which would have imposed tougher sentences on extortionists. They continue to refuse to repeal Bills C-5 and Bill C-75, legislation that has fuelled a revolving-door justice system, where repeat of…

Read full speech →
Page 1 of 9