MyMP.ca

Bill C-38

Historical
Second reading (House)

An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)

Bill C-38 is at second reading in the House. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.

Sponsor:Patty Hajdu
Liberal
Session: 44-1
Introduced: 2022-12-14

Other Bills Numbered C-38

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 11 sessions:

44-1

An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)

Second reading (House)
42-1

An Act to amend An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exploitation and trafficking in persons)

Second reading (House)
41-2

An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2015

Law (royal assent given)
Law
41-1

An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures

Law (royal assent given)
Law
40-3

An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts

Second reading (House)
40-2

An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act to enlarge Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-2

An Act to permit the resumption and continuation of the operation of the National Research Universal Reactor at Chalk River

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-1

An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2007

Law (royal assent given)
Law
38-1

An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes

Law (royal assent given)
Law
37-2

An Act to amend the Contraventions Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act

Not active
37-1

An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law

Division Votes (0)

No recorded division votes found for this bill.

Parliamentary Debates (88)

Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-38.

2024-11-28
Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
Procedural

Private Members' Business

The House resumed from April 18 consideration of the motion that Bill C-380, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (plastic manufactured items), be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Read full speech →
Ms. Melissa Lantsman2024-10-21
RCMP Allegations of Foreign Interference by the Go…
0

Emergency Debate

…s voted against the bill. It was a bill by my co-deputy leader, the member for Edmonton Mill Woods, Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act. Every single one of them voted against it. Some did not show up, but the rest voted against it. The United States managed to thwart an assassination attempt on…

Read full speech →
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan2024-10-21
RCMP Allegations of Foreign Interference by the Go…
0

Emergency Debate

…The Liberals are bragging about their record, but they voted down a common-sense Conservative bill, Bill C-381, brought forward by our common-sense Conservative deputy leader, the member for Edmonton Mill Woods, and so did the NDP. Can the member please comment on how that makes any sense?

Read full speech →
Hon. Tim Uppal2024-10-21
RCMP Allegations of Foreign Interference by the Go…
0

Emergency Debate

…ing and paying gangs here in Canada. One solution that we put forward was my private member's bill, Bill C-381. It is important that, as opposition members, we put solutions forward. The fact is that, right now in Canada, there is no minimum penalty for extortion, but with Bill C-381, anybody committing exto…

Read full speech →
Ms. Elizabeth May2024-09-26
The Environment
0

Adjournment Proceedings

…ues with what Stephen Harper did in wrecking environmental assessment in, yes again, omnibus budget Bill C-38 in spring 2012. This was a chance to fix it. The Liberals blew it.

Read full speech →
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan2024-09-26
Public Safety
0

Oral Questions

…lies and businesses. The Liberal-NDP coalition voted against the Conservative deputy leader's bill, Bill C-381, to crack down on extortion. Instead, the coalition made it easier for criminals to get bail and to re-offend. Why is the freedom of criminals more important to the government than protecting extort…

Read full speech →
Mr. Jasraj Singh Hallan2024-09-26
Public Safety
0

Statements by Members

…ster and both Liberal MPs from Alberta voted against a common-sense Conservative bill on extortion, Bill C-381, so they could keep the Liberal-NDP Prime Minister in power and protect the NDP leader's $2.2-million pension. Common-sense Conservatives are the only party standing up and protecting victims; the L…

Read full speech →
Mr. Garnett Genuis2024-09-19
Petitions
0

Routine Proceedings

…invasion of their territory by the Russian Federation. In particular, petitioners are in support of Bill C-388, my private member's bill, which would advance a number of measures aimed at giving Ukraine the support that it needs, particularly in the area of weapons. Petitioners note that the government has p…

Read full speech →
Mr. James Bezan2024-06-19
Committees of the House
0

Routine Proceedings

…on that was announced in September 2023. We also say that we want to see the private member's bill, Bill C-386, an act respecting the establishment and award of a special service medal for domestic and emergency relief operations, from the member for Cariboo—Prince George, be accepted by the government and c…

Read full speech →
Mr. Arpan Khanna2024-05-28
Justice
0

Oral Questions

… these criminals behind bars by strengthening our extortion laws. Why did the Liberals vote against Bill C-381 to fight extortion?

Read full speech →