Bill C-38
An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)
Bill C-38 is at second reading in the House. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.
Other Bills Numbered C-38
Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 11 sessions:
An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)
An Act to amend An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exploitation and trafficking in persons)
Appropriation Act No. 2, 2014-15
Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act
Ensuring the Effective Review of RCMP Civilian Complaints Act
An Act Creating One of the World's Largest National Park Reserves
An Act to permit the resumption and continuation of the operation of the National Research Universal Reactor at Chalk River
Appropriation Act No. 2, 2006-2007
Civil Marriage Act
An Act to amend the Contraventions Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act
Division Votes (0)
No recorded division votes found for this bill.
Parliamentary Debates (95)
Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-38.
Private Members' Business
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to rise today to address Bill C-380, a private member's bill from my friend and colleague, the member for Saskatoon—University, with the very important aim of repealing the government's irresponsible and senseless ban on single-use pl…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Madam Speaker, I rise today to speak to Bill C-380, an act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, regarding plastic manufactured items, introduced by the member for Saskatoon—University, whom we just heard from. If passed, Bill C-…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
…police to use. Here is the problem with this proposal and the reason the NDP will be voting against Bill C-381: The evidence is clear that mandatory minimums are not effective as a deterrent. As a tool, mandatory minimums do not deter people from committing crime. No criminals sit around at home thumbing thr…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
moved that Bill C-381, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (extortion), be read the second time and referred to a committee. Mr. Speaker, crime is wreaking havoc in our neighbourhoods and communities right across this coun…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to speak today to Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act. As we all know, extortion is increasingly impacting Canadian communities. We recognize and acknowledge that extortion is a very serious crime that can impact m…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
…hink about and work on improving the Criminal Code. The Bloc Québécois is therefore willing to send Bill C-381 to committee and work on bringing it into line with the values of safety and security, justice and appropriate consequences for wrongdoing, while seeking to create a better society in the short or m…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
…d hon. member for Edmonton Mill Woods has taken decisive action by introducing a common-sense bill, Bill C-381, the protection against extortion act. This legislation marks a critical shift towards restoring the rule of law and providing substantial deterrence against the crime of extortion. Bill C-381 is ca…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
…y important that we all participate and that we ensure that we have given it our full attention. On Bill C-381, I am going to read out what it is, so that anybody who is watching will get a better feeling and understanding. Bill C-381 would amend the offence of extortion to create a mandatory minimum penalty…
Read full speech →Routine Proceedings
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-386, An Act respecting the establishment and award of a Special Service Medal for Domestic Emergency Relief Operations. Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to rise to today and table my new private member's bill…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, on the topic of Bill C-38, the department estimates that around 3,500 individuals would be enfranchised. That ultimately means that any financial costs of integrating them would be put onto Indian bands. Section 10 bands have…
Read full speech →