Bill C-38
An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)
Bill C-38 is at second reading in the House. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.
Other Bills Numbered C-38
Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 11 sessions:
An Act to amend the Indian Act (new registration entitlements)
An Act to amend An Act to amend the Criminal Code (exploitation and trafficking in persons)
An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2015
An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures
An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act to enlarge Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada
An Act to permit the resumption and continuation of the operation of the National Research Universal Reactor at Chalk River
An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2007
An Act respecting certain aspects of legal capacity for marriage for civil purposes
An Act to amend the Contraventions Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act
Division Votes (0)
No recorded division votes found for this bill.
Parliamentary Debates (88)
Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-38.
Government Orders
…t, and I appreciate her voice and leadership more than she knows. I was so disappointed when I read Bill C-38. She confirmed for me my sense that this is so much less than what one should expect at this point. I was the first member of Parliament, as far as I know, a number of years ago, to call for the repe…
Read full speech →Government Orders
…ration. The Indian Act is an attempt to erase indigenous peoples from the lands we now call Canada. Bill C-38 is about status. It could have been about addressing discrimination to the fullest extent. I struggle to support Bill C-38, an act to amend the Indian Act. I am conflicted and disappointed to witness…
Read full speech →Government Orders
…the member brought forward when talking about the real need. I think they amplify the importance of Bill C-38. I know from personal experience in dealing with constituents, in particular a very good, dear friend of mine, Mr. Chartrand, that we have been trying as much as possible to make sure there is some j…
Read full speech →Government Orders
…o in serving the people that we get to serve. With those comments out of the way, let us talk about Bill C-38 for a few minutes. I appreciate the opportunity that my colleague has presented to me to speak on this very important bill. Bill C-38 is an act that amends the Indian Act to address four separate mat…
Read full speech →Oral Questions
…it. The bill is good for Quebeckers and Canadians. Tomorrow, we will begin second reading debate of Bill C-38, which deals with new registration entitlements. I am sure my colleague is very interested to hear that, on Monday, we will debate Bill C-56, the affordable housing and groceries act. On Tuesday and …
Read full speech →Government Orders
…means that a future government will not repeal it. I recall spring 2012 and an omnibus budget bill, Bill C-38, which repealed the Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act, repealed the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy Act and gutted the Fisheries Act. There were 70 separate pieces of legislat…
Read full speech →Government Orders
…onfirm that this is an omnibus bill, but it is not an illegitimate omnibus bill. It is nothing like Bill C-38 of spring 2012 when the previous administration under Stephen Harper destroyed 70 different acts in one bill with changes that had not been forecast in the budget. That was an illegitimate omnibus bi…
Read full speech →Government Orders
…be in a budget implementation bill, as we experienced in 2012 with two budget implementation bills, Bill C-38 and Bill C-45, that were disastrous. Then we had, in 2018, one sneaky thing that I lament, which was putting deferred prosecution agreements in the Criminal Code. That should not have been in a budge…
Read full speech →