Parliamentary Speeches
634 speeches by Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay — Page 1 of 13
Government Orders
Madam Speaker, I would like to ask my colleague a question, and I thank her for her excellent grasp of the subject. My question may stray from the subject and be more institutional, given that my colleague herself talked about the power of the opposition parties and the constructive work we can do. I had a similar experience at one of the committees I serve on. We studied Bill C-11 on sexual misco…
Read full speech →Oral Questions
Mr. Speaker, at the beginning of the conflict, the Prime Minister said he supported the United States and Israel. Since then, he has been reconsidering his position on a daily basis. The lives of Canadian Armed Forces soldiers in Kuwait have been threatened by Iranian missile fire. The Prime Minister knew about it, as did the Minister of National Defence and perhaps the entire cabinet, but parliam…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, the link between national security and economic security is obvious, especially at a time of grave geopolitical and economic peril like today. I would not call the Davie shipyard a success; it was a long time coming. There were many setbacks. There was a bipartisan consensus to create a lot of problems. Having said that, I do not have a problem with the agreement itself. However, I wo…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, when it comes to trade agreements such as the ones we have just studied in committee, the Conservatives often get all worked up and rightly accuse the government of not knowing how to negotiate. However, by supporting the amendments I proposed, they would have had the opportunity to change that and correct certain mistakes. Why did the Conservatives not do that, preferring instead to …
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I do not know whether there is enough time, but I would like to put a question back to him. What is the point of having an official policy if it is not followed? My colleague tells us that there is no need for a change in procedure, and yet Canada's official policy made up a substantial part of the legislation that we introduced and that was unfortunately defeated. That policy can be …
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, a good part of my speech was about that, and I talked about it in my previous answer, but I have no problem repeating it. Expanded meat access was one of the promises in the agreement with the European Union. Cheesemakers in Quebec were told to accept the breach, the slight setback, because in exchange, our meat could be exported to the large European market. However, the European Uni…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, on the one hand, it would ensure that parliamentarians are not being played for fools, that they are not just here to rubber-stamp agreements. It is my understanding that we were elected by the people to represent interests and values, so doing actual work on agreements should be a big part of our responsibility. What the bill would have done, for example, is set a minimum time frame …
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, as I said earlier, when we examine a trade agreement implementation bill in committee, there is not much that we can amend, but this is one of the few things that we can change. Since the implementation bill has to change the legal system to recognize the ISDS, it is a legal clause. However, I am always just about the only committee member to vote against that clause. I vote in favour…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I thought that my colleague's speech was very good. He demonstrated just how much of a failed negotiation this was. He explained that the government's negotiations failed with respect to meat exports from Canada and Quebec to the United Kingdom. It seems to me that when doing a favour for a country by allowing it to become party to an agreement as significant as the trans-Pacific part…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, my colleague and I studied this agreement together at the Standing Committee on International Trade. I was disappointed that he voted against almost all of my amendment proposals, which were nothing more than requests for transparency, for reports on certain elements, on the environment, on human rights and on lawsuits by multinationals against governments. All I was doing was demandi…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to rise today to speak to Bill C‑13. I always get these numbers mixed up. We always end up losing track because there are so many bills. However, as the Bloc Québécois critic for international trade, I want to reassure my colleagues that I know what this bill is about. This is an agreement that the committee I serve on was able to study. Although this agreement does not…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by thanking my colleague for her kind words about the work I did on investor-state dispute settlement. I would also like to ask her about that. How does she explain the fact that the two pro-multinational parties in the House, which have been trading power back and forth in Canada since the beginning, are constantly signing agreements with these archaic provision…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, can you give me another 20 minutes? That question cannot be answered properly in such a short period of time. Also, I think it would likely involve repeating things that I mentioned and elaborated on in my speech. In committee, I tried to make what I thought were moderate amendments. It is unfortunate that my Liberal and Conservative colleagues did not accept them. For example, I vote…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent question. As I said, diversification is always a good idea. Could the government have done better, even in this regard? To circle back to my previous answer, there are some good and some not-so-good elements in the agreement. There are many good economic elements. There are not so many in other areas. Even though the government could have gone further, diversifica…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in the House today to speak about the proposed trade agreement with Indonesia. Indeed, everyone is talking about diversifying markets and partners these days. There is a lot of talk about this. It is an idea that has become quite popular just in the past year. I wonder why that is. We are in favour of free trade, but not at any cost. I will come back to that short…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I understand that the question is about consulting businesses, entrepreneurs and so on. That probably happened to some extent. As far as the premiers are concerned, I think I did a pretty good job of explaining how the provinces had no input and no say in the matter. Just because somebody gets a call and is asked what they think about a particular topic does not mean that they have ve…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, the beauty of 20-minute speeches is the opportunity to say that there are good things and not-so-good things. I think that is the beauty of this type of speech. There are certainly some good things for our producers and exporters, but there are some very bad things in terms of the environment, the rights of multinational corporations, and human rights. I think that sums it up.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, this gives me an opportunity to explore this issue in greater depth, because too few people are talking about it. Civil society is fairly well informed on this topic; there were protests in the 1990s against the worst cases of misuse of this clause in agreements. However, it sounds very abstract and legal when people talk about “investor-state dispute settlements”. People think they n…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, I am going to ask a very simple question. Today I am hearing the Conservatives say that there is an urgent need to overthrow this regime. How is it that, prior to this American and Israeli attack, I had never heard them calling for such intervention?
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, my colleague is of course talking about this regime change, which is a good thing in itself. Here is my first question. When has it ever worked? In Iraq, for example, did a regime change imposed by an attacking force go well? Second, during the Obama era, an agreement was reached to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities and control its ballistic missile program. China was there, Russia wa…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, I rise on a point of order. I simply want to explain to my colleague that there is a difference between hoping for regime change and hoping that the protesters succeed, and wishing for a military attack.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, I think it is pretty clear where our positions differ. Although we agree that we should not be partisan, it is also healthy to have a debate. It is healthy when not everyone is moving in the same direction. That is normal, because truth emerges from compromise and from tensions reaching equilibrium. That is how things should work in a democracy. If we all moved in the same direction, it…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, my question will be short and clear. I would like the answer to be short and clear too, ideally a yes or no. We know that a lot of countries have been getting ready to offer proper consular services for a long time. Yes or no, does Canada have a contingency plan for providing consular services?
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, I thank my colleague for her contribution to the debate, even if we disagree. I fully understand why people desperately want to see this regime relegated to the trash heap of history. However, at what time in history and in which country have we seen an armed liberator successfully impose democracy on a country in the aftermath of an attack?
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, I would like to ask the minister a question. First, since he mentioned it in his speech, what is Canada's official position now? I understand that when a situation evolves, positions have to be adjusted, but why have there been so many contradictory messages in such a short time? Furthermore, I know that a contingency plan is now finally in place, but why is it that, while everyone else…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, my colleague clearly has a parliamentary secretary's file on the specific issue of Canada-U.S. relations. I know, having travelled with him before, that he has contacts with the Americans. The relationship with the Americans is important, but that does not mean that we have to take them at their word, follow their every move and repeat everything they say. Once upon a time, under the le…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Chair, I do not think anyone here in the House can be in any way accused of sympathizing with that regime. Now we are talking about threats. During Barack Obama's presidency, there was a nuclear deal. It was going well, it was working. It was ripped up during Donald Trump's first term. There was a way to make it work. What is more, that regime was becoming increasingly unpopular and was collap…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, I have a simple question for my colleague. Humanitarian support absolutely has its place and must be deployed because the situation over there is extremely serious. However, does she agree that, at this point in time, not one soldier should be deployed over there for military purposes?
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, I am more than happy to answer that question. The parliamentary secretary can go back and listen to my leader's speech, which he delivered at around 7 p.m. Actually, I think he could listen to my answer as well. He is asking me a question from the other side of the House. That explains why he was not aware that our leader delivered a speech earlier.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, quite honestly, I say this with some reservation because I have not specifically researched the subject of the question. I will therefore be cautious with my answers. Based on the wording and the way it was phrased, and if everything is accurate, then yes, there appears to be a significant degree of laxity. What did she say? She said that only one individual had been deported. That is…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, tonight we are holding a take-note debate, but it could have been an emergency debate. In fact, many of us requested that it be an emergency debate. This debate concerns an issue that is extremely serious and extremely worrying: the situation in the Middle East. As members of the human race, I think we all have reasons to grieve and worry about what is happening. Some Quebeckers sitti…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, I thank my colleague for the question, as it will allow me to conclude my speech. What I had left to say would have taken about a minute. If she wants us to go back in history, we can go back to a fairly recent time when there was a ballistic missile agreement that limited the deployment of nuclear material. This resulted in Iran disposing of 95% of its uranium and allowed inspectors …
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, I will not point out the presence or absence of anyone either, but I will say that I would have really liked, given the importance of this moment, to know the Prime Minister's position. I would have liked to hear it, but I imagine that will not happen tonight.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Madam Chair, that is indeed the case. Consular services are falling short. In fact, the newspaper was reporting on how francophones were being answered in English only. That does not measure up. That is unacceptable, but the scariest part is the lack of preparation before things started.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I am wondering about something. I have a hard time understanding the Conservatives' position on Bill C‑15. They were enthused about Bill C‑5 last June; they supported not only Bill C‑5, but the different closure motions as well, including the super closure motion imposed that week. Furthermore, what kind of official opposition would support the closure motion of a government that want…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for tabling this bill before the House. Does he agree that the full and active participation of organizations representing first nations is an essential condition and a fundamental prerequisite for any reform?
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Mr. Speaker, I freely admit that until very recently I was convinced that forced sterilization was already illegal, as it seems to me to be a matter of basic common sense. No one should be subjected to such an inhumane and degrading practice. Despite a legal framework that is already strict in Quebec and Canada and despite multiple safeguards that protect patient consent, this requirement can stil…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, that is an easy answer. So far, the only political games and disinformation I have seen have come from the members accusing us of doing everything we can to block high-speed rail, especially when those members are champions of oil subsidies who are now lecturing us about the environment.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I thank him for correcting me, just as I corrected him earlier. That is a very fair thing to do. I really enjoy working with him too. I would like to throw the ball back to him along with the compliment. I gave incorrect information earlier, and I apologize. It was June 16, not June 13. The member for Châteauguay—Les Jardins-de-Napierville had voted in favour. Now, to get back to the …
Read full speech →Government Orders
Thank you Mr. Speaker. Quite often, the questions we get later on come from the people who did not listen. Then they ask us about things that we repeated about 15 times during our speech. Before I continue, I should mention that I will be sharing my time with my esteemed colleague from Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj. Now let us briefly discuss a few points. We know that the proposed ro…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, June 13 was the date of the closure debate. We are checking whether the member voted on it. We will give her the answer in a minute. My colleagues can whisper the answer to me. As far as Bill C-5 is concerned, it definitely does not mention Mirabel or the high-speed rail. It does not talk about the projects themselves, but it offers the ability to assume the powers to carry them out. …
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Mr. Speaker, as far as I am concerned, we are resuming debate and I an resuming my speech, because I was barely able to begin it the last time. The two minutes I had was barely enough time to say good evening. I will pick up where I left off. Housing is an issue that is—
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, this is what fascinates me. The government has been telling us for a while now that apologies were already given, that it is unacceptable and that it must not be minimized. If true, it would not cost the Liberals much at all to vote for the motion if they think it makes no difference.
Read full speech →Government Orders
Is four years too long? It depends on the project. For some, it is. For example, in the Quebec City region, there is still talk of a third link. The governing party is in the midst of a leadership race. Not all projects are structured in the same way. Not all projects require the same speed or the same level of verification. Not all projects are of the same scope either. A high-speed train that wo…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I salute my colleague. Indeed, a whole series of regulations has been established over the past 60 years. However, none of them did anything to prevent the tragic events that occurred in Mirabel in the 1980s. Bill C-5 was passed last June. We have the ability to suspend laws and impose certain things. Furthermore, a proponent can sit down privately with a minister and, without consult…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, my comment is somewhat along the same lines. When we debated a motion six years ago on an apology for the victims of the October crisis, we were told that it belonged to the past. A few weeks ago, when we were talking about the Prime Minister's speech on the Plains of Abraham, we were told that we were living in the past and that what matters is jobs, the economy, public services, etc…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I listened with great interest to my colleague's speech, just as I have been listening to all of our colleagues' speeches for a while now, but there is something that I do not understand. Our motion is written in three parts. Regarding the apology to the those whose land was expropriated in Mirabel, the Liberals tell us that it has been done and that they agree with it. As for acknowl…
Read full speech →Private Members' Business
Mr. Speaker, the member speaking is certainly a member who asks questions. I invite him to listen first and then ask questions. Housing is an issue that is extremely important to me because there is a major housing crisis in my region, like everywhere else. It is hitting us so hard that the city of Saint‑Hyacinthe, which is home to two-thirds of my riding's population, has long had the dubious dis…
Read full speech →Government Orders
Mr. Speaker, I did not think it was my turn to give a speech. If I had known, I would not have fought to ask a question so quickly. I would have saved a few punches for my speech. In any case, I will be repeating some of what I said. I am pleased to rise in the House now to speak to the motion we are moving on our opposition day today. I will read the text, which has three parts: That the House ca…
Read full speech →Oral Questions
Mr. Speaker, in Davos, the Prime Minister emphasized the importance of diversifying trade markets, and rightly so. However, he himself is blocking a trade agreement with Taiwan. Taiwan's representative in Canada has confirmed that all pages of the agreement have been initialled by both parties and that the document is ready and has been printed in three languages. All that is missing is the Prime …
Read full speech →