Bill C-48

Historical
Law (royal assent given)
Law

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bail reform)

Bill C-48 has received Royal Assent and is now law. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.

Sponsor:David Lametti
Session: 44-1
Introduced: 2023-05-16

Other Bills Numbered C-48

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 11 sessions:

44-1

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bail reform)

Law (royal assent given)
Law
42-1

Oil Tanker Moratorium Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law
41-2

Modernization of Canada's Grain Industry Act

Second reading (House)
41-1

Technical Tax Amendments Act, 2012

Law (royal assent given)
Law
40-3

Protecting Canadians by Ending Sentence Discounts for Multiple Murders Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law
40-2

Appropriation Act No. 2, 2009-2010

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-2

Appropriation Act No. 4, 2007-2008

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-1

An Act to amend the Criminal Code in order to implement the United Nations Convention against Corruption

Law (royal assent given)
Law
38-1

An Act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments

Law (royal assent given)
Law
37-2

An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (natural resources)

Law (royal assent given)
Law
37-1

An Act to amend the Copyright Act

Bill passed the House, now waiting to be considered in the Senate

Division Votes (0)

No recorded division votes found for this bill.

Parliamentary Debates (324)

Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-48.

Dan Albas2026-03-23
Jail Not Bail Act
0

Private Members' Business

… of catch-and-release, and it is precisely why incremental changes since that time, whether they be Bill C-48 in the previous Parliament or Bill C-14 in the current Parliament, will not fix the problem. That is why the jail not bail act is necessary. Unlike Liberal half measures, the jail not bail act would …

Read full speech →
Stephanie Kusie2026-03-10
Government Business No. 6—Proceedings on Bill C-9
0

Government Orders

…a Act provides powers to get major projects approved in Canada, but it does not repeal Bill C-69 or Bill C-48, which would make it palatable to investors. That would have made it even easier for us as Conservatives to support it, even though we did. We gave them every opportunity to create prosperity in this…

Read full speech →
Hon. Pierre Poilievre2026-03-09
Iran and the Middle East
0

Government Orders

…y not only ourselves but the entire world. We need to repeal anti-energy laws such as Bill C-69 and Bill C-48, and the industrial carbon tax, to unblock and unlock our resources, shipping them off our coasts in order to fuel our friends and power our paycheques. In this way, we can make the country both more…

Read full speech →
Jasraj Hallan2026-02-25
Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1
0

Government Orders

…rn, because the same failed policies, like Bill C-69, the “no new pipelines” bill, are still there. Bill C-48, which does not let our product leave the west coast, is still there. The industrial carbon tax, which also contributes to higher grocery prices, is still there. While I am talking about grocery pric…

Read full speech →
Larry Brock2026-02-10
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…last 10 years when she herself voted in favour of Bill C-75, in favour of Bill C-5 and in favour of Bill C-48, which created the problems we are facing right now with extortion. It is fine to say they are taking it seriously now, but where was she 10 years ago?

Read full speech →
Jasraj Hallan2026-02-02
Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act
0

Government Orders

…y. However, because of anti-development laws and taxes like Bill C-69, the no new pipeline bill, or Bill C-48, which does not let our oil and gas leave the west coast, and the industrial carbon tax, pipelines are not getting built. Mines are not getting built. Nothing is getting built in Canada because of th…

Read full speech →
Hon. Pierre Poilievre2026-01-27
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…ant and would let us stand on our own two feet. It would repeal the anti-energy laws, Bill C-69 and Bill C-48, so we can ship energy off our coast. It would rapidly approve a pipeline to the Pacific in order to move 30 billion dollars' worth of our oil to overseas markets, which is bigger than the total expo…

Read full speech →
Shannon Stubbs2026-01-27
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…he fact that I just said those words. I agree with her that we have to set the facts straight about Bill C-48. Actually, this is a lesson in how effective the Liberals were at eating the NDP opposition whole while the NDP did not do its job. This is because, in fact, Bill C-48 did not give any teeth to the v…

Read full speech →
Garnett Genuis2026-01-27
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…on one thing the member said about the most sensitive waters in the world in his defence of Liberal Bill C-48, which blocked energy pipelines to the west coast. Does the member acknowledge that foreign oil tankers are in the same ocean and in the same areas? Does he acknowledge that preventing exports from C…

Read full speech →
Shannon Stubbs2026-01-27
Business of Supply
0

Government Orders

…g, (i) the Impact Assessment Act (formerly Bill C-69), (ii) the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act (formerly Bill C-48), (iii) the federal industrial carbon tax, (iv) the oil and gas emissions cap, (v) the federal electric vehicle sales mandate, (vi) the federal plastics manufacturing prohibitions, (vii) federal regu…

Read full speech →