Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
In the 90 days to September 18, 2026, 1 organization lobbied Maxime Blanchette-Joncas across 4 meetings — most often about Regional Development. The most frequent visitor was David Suzuki Foundation (1 meeting, via their in-house lobbyist Pierre Iachetti). Its registration describes the goal as “Finalizing the BC salmon aquaculture transition plan to achieve 2029 ban on open net-pen salmon aquaculture in BC”. That's fewer than the average MP, who had 6 meetings over the same period.
Based on federal lobbying registry data to September 18, 2026
In the House · Oct 5–6
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas this week
- No speeches in the House · the average MP spoke 2 times
- AGAINSTC-218, second reading — Medical assistance in dying · defeated 141–187
- AGAINSTOpposition Motion (Diesel prices) · defeated 133–196
- FORFifth report of the Standing Committee on Health · passed 196–132
Get Maxime Blanchette-Joncas's week in your inbox every Monday
What they said, how they voted, and who lobbied them. Free, no ads, unsubscribe anytime.
How Maxime Blanchette-Joncas actually voted
Their recorded positions on the issues Canadians care about — pulled straight from the parliamentary record.
- Voted Against
- Voted For
Healthcare
Fifth report of the Standing Committee on Health
Oct 2026 · Passed
- Voted Against
Labour & Employment
Establish a national framework respecting skilled trades and labour mobility
C-266 · Sep 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
- Voted Against
Economy & Taxation
Implement certain provisions of the spring economic update tabled in Parliament on April 28, 2026
C-30 · Jun 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
- Voted For
Housing
Authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply
C-26 · Jun 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
Overall leanings
100%
voted with the Bloc Québécois line this Parliament
98%
vote attendance (173/177, missed 4)
Who's lobbying Maxime
Individual meeting records from the federal lobbying registry
| Date | Organization | |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-14 | Unknown | |
| 2026-09-01 | ||
| 2026-08-28 | David Suzuki Foundation | |
| 2026-08-10 | Unknown | |
| 2026-06-16 | Children's Healthcare Canada |
Write to Maxime Blanchette-Joncas
Pick what it's about. You'll get a letter you can edit, then send it from your own email.
Other ways to reach Maxime
613-992-4211 is the House of Commons switchboard — ask to be connected to your MP's office. For constituency office contact details, or if maxime.blanchette-joncas@parl.gc.ca bounces, visit their Parliament profile.
Committee Memberships
Top Lobbying Clients
Companies with the most meetings with this MP since July 2008
What Maxime talks about
- Criminal Code17 speeches · 2021–2023
- Strengthening Canada's Immigration System and Borders Act17 speeches · 2025
- Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 116 speeches · 2025
- National Security Review of Investments Modernization Act14 speeches · 2023
- Commissioner for Modern Treaty Implementation Act12 speeches · 2025–2026
Recent Speeches
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Transport mentioned wanting to use the available expertise to accelerate projects of national interest. Speaking of expertise, Canada's chief science adviser told the Standing Committee on Science and Research that she had never been consulted about projects of national … Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Transport mentioned wanting to use the available expertise to accelerate projects of national interest. Speaking of expertise, Canada's chief science adviser told the Standing Committee on Science and Research that she had never been consulted about projects of national interest. It is funny. The minister is talking about expertise, but he is not consulting his own expert, who is paid with public money. Instead of trying to convince us that he is using available expertise, can he simply confirm that he uses it only when it suits his narrative?
Mr. Speaker, allow me to remind the Conservative leader of a few things that seem to be moving well. The first are the several Conservative members who crossed the floor to the Liberals. That even made it possible to deliver a majority, for the first time in history, after a minority government was … Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, allow me to remind the Conservative leader of a few things that seem to be moving well. The first are the several Conservative members who crossed the floor to the Liberals. That even made it possible to deliver a majority, for the first time in history, after a minority government was elected in Parliament. The other things that are moving quite well are all the Conservative ideas that are being taken up by the Liberals. It is quite striking. The Conservative Party also promises to build energy, electricity and rail corridors. The Liberal Party is proposing the same thing in Bill C‑39. The Conservatives claim to support Quebec's autonomy. Will they put their foot down and ensure that Quebec's wishes as to whether or not we want this type of project on our territory are respected?
Mr. Speaker, it is quite clear that we are witnessing an ecological betrayal. We know that the Prime Minister is not just anyone. He worked at Brookfield. Most importantly, he is the United Nation's former special envoy on climate. However, he is the one buying a second pipeline with public funds an… Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, it is quite clear that we are witnessing an ecological betrayal. We know that the Prime Minister is not just anyone. He worked at Brookfield. Most importantly, he is the United Nation's former special envoy on climate. However, he is the one buying a second pipeline with public funds and disregarding all of Canada's environmental laws for the sake of projects that are in the so-called national interest. If that is not a betrayal, my colleagues will have to let me know the strongest word there is to judge, observe and analyze that situation. I would like my colleague from Joliette to explain his point of view. Is the government turning the environment into a pipe dream by trying to take advantage of the tariff crisis to push things that could never have been done before?
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I understand that my colleague from Beauport—Limoilou has some good stories to share about his summer, but that is not the subject of the bill we are currently discussing. I would like you to call him to order.
Mr. Speaker, I do not understand part of my colleague's argument, and I would like her to explain it. She criticized the government for shutting down debate and shutting off the cameras. However, in June of last year, the Liberals did the same thing during the study of Bill C-5 on projects of nation… Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, I do not understand part of my colleague's argument, and I would like her to explain it. She criticized the government for shutting down debate and shutting off the cameras. However, in June of last year, the Liberals did the same thing during the study of Bill C-5 on projects of national interest. Who supported that closure motion? It was supported by her party, the Conservative Party. I would simply like her to explain why it was okay to turn off the cameras and support the closure motion last year, but it is no longer acceptable this year.
Bills Sponsored
3 since 2001