
Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba
In the 90 days to October 1, 2026, 2 organizations lobbied Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba across 2 meetings — most often about Foreign Affairs. The most frequent visitor was International Justice Mission Canada (1 meeting, via their in-house lobbyist Wayne Alguire). Its registration describes the goal as “Lobbying for legislation, policies, law enforcement and investments that will prevent the online sexual exploitation of children”. That's fewer than the average MP, who had 6 meetings over the same period.
Based on federal lobbying registry data to October 1, 2026
In the House · Oct 5–9
Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba this week
“Can he explain to me how he would do a better job defending the benefits of this bill? This bill does not remove standards. Instead, it sets out guidelines to fast-track the implementation of projects so that Canada can be the master in its own house.”
- Spoke 9 times in the House · the average MP spoke 5 times
- FORC-39, second reading — Respecting certain measures to strengthen the economy · passed 296–26
- AGAINSTC-218, second reading — Medical assistance in dying · defeated 141–187
- AGAINSTOpposition Motion (Diesel prices) · defeated 133–196
- FORFifth report of the Standing Committee on Health · passed 196–132
Get Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba's week in your inbox every Monday
What they said, how they voted, and who lobbied them. Free, no ads, unsubscribe anytime.
How Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba actually voted
Their recorded positions on the issues Canadians care about — pulled straight from the parliamentary record.
- Voted Against
- Voted For
Healthcare
Fifth report of the Standing Committee on Health
Oct 2026 · Passed
- Voted For
Economy & Taxation
Implement certain provisions of the spring economic update tabled in Parliament on April 28, 2026
C-30 · Jun 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
- Voted For
Housing
Authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply
C-26 · Jun 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
- Voted For
Criminal Justice
Hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places
C-9 · Jun 2026 · Passed · Tell your MP what you think
Overall leanings
100%
voted with the Liberal line this Parliament
100%
vote attendance (178/178)
Who's lobbying Bienvenu-Olivier
Individual meeting records from the federal lobbying registry
| Organization | |
|---|---|
| International Justice Mission Canada2026-09-18 · Telecommunications; Financial Institutions; Industry; International Relations; Justice and Law Enforcement | |
| Public Service Alliance of Canada2026-08-29 · Labour; Budget | |
| Canadian Centre for Child Protection Inc.2026-05-20 · Health; Industry; Justice and Law Enforcement; Science and Technology; Privacy and Access to Information | |
| Canadian Parents for French2026-04-23 · Employment and Training; Arts and Culture; Bilingualism/Official Languages; Economic Development; Federal-Provincial Relations | |
| Client not named in the registry2026-04-22 · International Development |
Write to Bienvenu-Olivier Ntumba
Pick what it's about. You'll get a letter you can edit, then send it from your own email.
Other ways to reach Bienvenu-Olivier
613-992-4211 is the House of Commons switchboard — ask to be connected to your MP's office. For constituency office contact details, or if bienvenu-olivier.ntumba@parl.gc.ca bounces, visit their Parliament profile.
Committee Memberships
What Bienvenu-Olivier talks about
- Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 18 speeches · 2025
- Building Canada Strong Act8 speeches · 2026
- Making Life More Affordable for Canadians Act7 speeches · 2025
- Build Canada Homes Act6 speeches · 2026
- Combatting Hate Act6 speeches · 2026
Recent Speeches
Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a great speech. She did an outstanding job of laying out all of our government's commitments. I would like her to explain to the House again how all of the commitments we have made since our election have steered Canada in the right direction.
Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a fine speech about the opinion of his political party. Can he explain to me how he would do a better job defending the benefits of this bill? This bill does not remove standards. Instead, it sets out guidelines to fast-track the implementation of projects so that Cana… Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, my colleague gave a fine speech about the opinion of his political party. Can he explain to me how he would do a better job defending the benefits of this bill? This bill does not remove standards. Instead, it sets out guidelines to fast-track the implementation of projects so that Canada can be the master in its own house. My colleague argued at length about his opposition to the pipeline, while Canada is diversifying its markets so that it is no longer dependent on a single market, the American market. Why would he not want to support this bill?
Mr. Speaker, Canadians want more housing, robust infrastructure, energy projects and trade corridors. Bill C-39 is specifically designed to reduce delays and enable projects of national interest to be completed more quickly, while, of course, maintaining the consultations and safeguards provided for… Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, Canadians want more housing, robust infrastructure, energy projects and trade corridors. Bill C-39 is specifically designed to reduce delays and enable projects of national interest to be completed more quickly, while, of course, maintaining the consultations and safeguards provided for by law. My question is simple. Does the Bloc Québécois actively support the objective of building faster here in Canada? If so, which specific measures would it like to see fast-tracked in Bill C-39?
Mr. Speaker, over the past few years, Canadians have seen how events that are happening far from home can have a very real effect on our economy. A conflict on the other side of the world can disrupt the energy market. A lack of shipping capacity can drive up costs for our businesses. A disruption o… Read full speechShow less
Mr. Speaker, over the past few years, Canadians have seen how events that are happening far from home can have a very real effect on our economy. A conflict on the other side of the world can disrupt the energy market. A lack of shipping capacity can drive up costs for our businesses. A disruption on a railway, on a highway or at a port can affect producers and consumers at both ends of the supply chain. In light of these circumstances, our government was elected on a clear commitment to strengthen Canada's economic sovereignty. Our country must have the means to build bigger, stronger and faster. Our supply chains are the backbone of our economy. They rely not only on our ports, our railways and our roads, but also on the workers who keep them running every day. Strong supply chains are therefore critical to our government's plan, a plan that seeks to double our exports to markets other than the United States, to build major projects and to attract more investors to Canada. Basically, Bill C-39 seeks to do one thing and that is strengthen our supply chains. It proposes a more holistic view of our transportation system. Today, we sometimes tend to look at the various components separately, whether it be a port, a railway, a highway or a border crossing. Bill C-39 would instead enable us to look at these infrastructure as different parts of a single trade network. The government could thus officially designate national trade corridors and establish performance measures for those corridors. In practical terms, that means tracking the movement of goods, identifying where delays are occurring, identifying capacity issues and measuring the performance of the entire network. Bill C-39 would also create a national trade corridors council. Its role would be to monitor the movement of goods, analyze disruptions, identify areas where the system can be improved and make recommendations to the Minister of Transport. Why does this matter? This matters because when we invest in our infrastructure, we want to invest in the right place. We want every investment to have the greatest possible impact. The reliability of our trade corridors has a very real impact. A congested port can mean additional costs for businesses. A lack of rail capacity can mean grain sitting in elevators rather than moving to markets. That is why the second major element of Bill C‑39 has to do with our ports. Canadian port authorities are critical to our supply chains. The bill would modernize their governance. It would also give them more trade and financial flexibility. This flexibility would allow them to invest, generate revenue and develop the infrastructure needed for trade. Bill C-39 also creates new indigenous advisory councils, since indigenous communities are essential partners in the development and operation of our transportation infrastructure. Bill C‑39 maintains the role of ports as non-profit organizations. It simply provides them with more opportunities for partnerships and capital projects. However, infrastructure is only part of the challenge. The other part is the regulatory system around it. Today, a business may have to provide similar information to several departments or agencies. That means a lot more forms, a lot more duplication and much higher administrative costs. Bill C‑39 would allow for better information sharing between authorized public government institutions. Our goal is simple: to reduce the administrative burden and make our processes more efficient. The bill would also promote paperless trade. It would recognize electronic transferable documents that meet international standards. This means simpler information sharing, less duplication and less paperwork. We need to build faster. Bill C‑39 also addresses project approval timelines. Bill C‑39 would create a transportation project office within Transport Canada. Its role would be to better coordinate federal authorizations and consultations for transportation projects. The goal is to provide a clearer federal pathway for priority infrastructure and to get projects from the application phase to the decision phase more efficiently. However, I want to be clear on this point. It is not about eliminating standards. It is about reducing duplication. It is not about removing consultation. Rather, it is about making the process more consistent and predictable, while upholding the standards that we are proud of as Canadians. Canada needs to be able to build faster while continuing to build responsibly. Lastly, Bill C-39 recognizes an incontrovertible reality: The resilience of our supply chains also depends on security. This bill would modernize Canada's transportation security clearance framework. It would expand the roles to which these clearances can apply, improve risk assessment, strengthen information sharing and provide better tools for granting, denying, suspending or cancelling a clearance. The goal is simple: We need to respond more effectively to complex and ever-changing threats because security is essential to the resilience of our supply chains. Taken together, these measures offer a practical, coordinated approach to strengthening the economy and making it work better. We need to be able to move goods from farms to silos, from mines to ports, from factories to markets and from our communities to customers around the world. We need a transportation system that can keep pace with our investments and with the opportunities available to us. That means building our capacity, but also making better use of the capacity we already have. It means having the information we need to understand how our corridors work. It also means ensuring that our ports have the necessary tools and flexibility to grow. This means making sure that when we approve and build major transportation projects, we do so with the coordination and predictability that Canadians expect. That is why strengthening our supply chains is fundamentally about strengthening Canada's economy. It is about building transportation capacity, improving coordination, strengthening our resilience and preparing Canada for the economy of today and the economy of tomorrow. That is how we are building Canada strong.
Mr. Speaker, I would ask him why he would not vote for this bill now to move Canada forward.
MyMP is free and run by one person in Edmonton. Reader support keeps it that way. Chip in