Dane Lloyd

Madam Speaker, it has been a very interesting debate today on Bill C-37, the proposed first nations clean water act. There is a saying: It feels like déjà vu all over again. Sadly, today is another day where we are debating yet another bill about getting indigenous peoples in this country access to the safe and clean drinking water they have every right to have access to. I think it is a tremendous failure of the government since 2015. It promised to end boil water advisories, and the fact that we are still seeing widespread boil water advisories, which are leading to disease like hepatitis A and other bacterial infections across indigenous communities across this country, is a real shame. I would like to also start by saying that I am extremely proud to be the MP for Parkland. Parkland resides within the Treaty 6 territory, which includes first nations such as Enoch Cree Nation, Paul First Nation, as well as the legacy of the Michel Band, which unfortunately, back in the 1950s, and in a very controversial and what I would say probably illegal action, lost its first nations status. They were enfranchised. I think it might be the only case in this country. I know that members of the Michel Band are still attempting to get their treaty status back to this day. We are here discussing clean water and indigenous rights. I have been speaking with indigenous peoples in my area and speaking with Chief Cody Thomas of Enoch Cree Nation. I have been working with them for years to find ways to address the need for clean drinking water. A lot of the high-profile cases are related to very rural and very remote communities, but they are not limited. Enoch Cree Nation is a nation that is situated right next to Edmonton, and until recently, it did not have access to drinking water from the city of Edmonton. I know it was a very hard fight, but now Enoch Cree Nation is getting clean drinking water from Edmonton. The fact that a first nation that is literally right next to a major urban area in this country did not have access to clean drinking water until very recently I think makes people realize how big the challenge is with getting it to first nations in very rural and remote areas. That being said, there are still areas of Enoch Cree Nation, as it is a rural community in many places, where homes are reliant on well water. I know my family farm is right next to Enoch Cree Nation, and we are on well water. Since the 1950s, there have been many abandoned legacy oil and gas wells and orphaned oil and gas wells. A number of years ago, during a very low period in oil prices, the Liberal government put forward a policy and put forward about $1 billion to try to stimulate the oil services industry in Alberta into cleaning up some of these orphaned and abandoned wells. I think that was a good policy. However, there are a lot of first nations that have these wells. I believe that in Enoch Cree Nation there are over 200 abandoned oil wells. These oil wells risk contaminating groundwater. There are arsenic risks. Unfortunately, when the government announced that program, there was $137 million left unspent. I put forward a letter to the Minister of Finance at the time, arguing that that money should be re-profiled to support first nations in cleaning up orphaned and abandoned oil wells, so they could protect their groundwater, their drinking water. Unfortunately, the government chose not to deploy the $137 million. I thought that could have gone a long way to supporting primarily Alberta first nations that are dealing with this very important issue. I also want to raise another topic. First nations members in my area came to me about part of this discussion we are having today, which is settlements. We are talking about $4.6 billion. It was rightly stated that a lot of this money is coming because of court cases the government has lost. I think a lot of Canadians are wondering, when we are talking about these billions of dollars, where all of this money is going. I am very concerned, as first nations representatives come to my office to talk to me and it has been increasingly widespread in the media that the funds from these settlements are being appropriated by law firms that are supposedly acting on behalf of these first nations. These monies are not getting into the hands of the first nations people who need those funds. This is not an isolated case, and in one case, it is clear that the government had actually been helping to facilitate what I would call the indentured servitude of a first nation. Indigenous Services Canada hand-picked a first nations board, unelected, and this first nations board was encouraged to sign on with one of these law firms. The senior negotiator for the Government of Canada working at ISC, an employee of the Government of Canada, who got this hand-picked first nation to sign on with this law firm quit the government afterward, and guess what. They were appointed as senior legal counsel for that law firm. This is a conflict of interest, and the government allowed it to happen. I want to give Canadians an example of just how bad some of these cases can be. These first nations are signing very complex legal agreements that contain poison pills that are not normal in the legal sphere, whereby if a first nation even tries to seek any form of independent legal advice to ask if the deal it is receiving is a good deal or not, it will be punished by the law firm. Money will be clawed back and members will be punished for speaking out against the law firm. In Saskatchewan, courts have found that these firms have been overbilling these first nations. When we are talking about supporting first nations, the government needs to ensure that there is accountability so that first nations are actually getting the money. Some of the cases that I am hearing are truly egregious. What we are seeing is the term “irrevocable directive”, whereby a first nation is signing away its rights to receive financial compensation in settlements from the government so that the money will go directly to a law firm rather than to the first nation. The billing practices are then not transparent, and Canadians and first nations are seeing this. They are watching their rights being undermined, and the Government of Canada is not doing anything about it. When we talk about ensuring that we get fresh water for first nations and that the Government of Canada is being fair to first nations, we need to ensure that there is accountability in the process to ensure that first nations are not being exploited by any third party actors and that they are fully aware, without intimidation, of their legal right to seek independent legal advice when they are signing agreements that involve their rights. We are talking about very high-profile cases in Alberta, where trust funds contain tens of millions of dollars, possibly over hundreds of millions of dollars, in funds that are intended to go to first nations. These are subject to ongoing litigation, but the fact that we are in a place in this country where first nations have to fight not only the government but the law firms that are supposed to be representing them to get what they justly deserve is a key part of the problem. If we do not deal with that part of the problem, we will continue to see cases of first nations not getting the financial support they deserve to get their water infrastructure and the resources needed to deal with first nations health care. We are talking about cows and plows agreements. We need to ensure that the government is holding all players, including itself, to account. I will certainly be fighting with my Conservative colleagues to hold the government to account to ensure that first nations and indigenous peoples have their rights respected and that they get access to the clean water they deeply deserve and have long deserved. It is long overdue that they get those resources.

Madam Speaker, we need to respect the rights of first nations. We need to ensure that first nations have a government that will have their back and will not constantly appeal and fight them in court, so they can get the clean water they deeply deserve. It is about partnership and about ensuring accountability as well.

Mr. Speaker, on October 19, my fellow Albertans will vote on whether Alberta should remain united with our great country or go down the uncertain path of separation. Our country has challenges, but I would choose our country over any other, any time. Former prime minister Harper once said, “Canada is, and always has been, our country.” We want Canada to be a true north that is as strong and as free as it can be in every way that matters, the best country in the world. My fellow Conservatives and I believe in this vision. That is why we serve. That is why Conservatives are fighting for a stronger Alberta within a united Canada, an Alberta that can reach its full potential without being held back by Ottawa. I urge my fellow Albertans to heed this call. Let us be a true north that is as strong and as free as it can be. May God bless our country. Long live Canada.

Mr. Speaker, under the Liberal government, Canada has seen an explosion in crime. The Liberals' soft-on crime policies have allowed hardened, violent criminals out on bail and house arrest. I encounter off-duty RCMP officers who tell me it is so bad that the drug dealers they arrest are back out on the street in mere hours. One such case in my community cost the life of a young girl, when a dangerous criminal on house arrest kidnapped and drowned her. Conservatives want to repeal Liberal bail policies and house arrest for violent criminals and to lock up violent repeat offenders. We want to bring in mandatory prison time for extortionists, human traffickers and fentanyl dealers. We want to end lenient sentencing discounts for violent non-citizens that are designed to prevent them from being deported. It is time for the Liberals to get on board and reject their 10 years of failed soft-on-crime Liberal policies that have unleashed chaos on our streets. Conservatives will always stand up for the rights of victims and law-abiding Canadians. It is time for the Liberals to do the same.

Mr. Speaker, as Remembrance Day approaches, military chaplains representing many faiths are deeply concerned about government instructions issued over the summer directing them not to reference God in prayer or spiritual reflections. This instruction defies a unanimous motion passed by the House in November 2024 that affirmed the rights of chaplains not to be restricted or punished for referencing God in prayer or reflections. I have raised this issue with the Minister of National Defence. Will he explain why this instruction was issued over the summer and confirm that chaplains will face no consequences for carrying out their sacred duties?